Thomas Cheesman

Method

How AI is a tool I work with and an accessibility feature itself

I decide what gets built, I am the imaginer, and I am the final check. The AI drafts and does the legwork on my ok. This page is how that holds together across many sessions, and the rules I keep because AI is still evolving.

The loop

One loop, every session

The brief is mine. The spec says what good means before anything is built. The agent builds. I review the copy block by block and rule on each one. A correction worth keeping becomes a rule, the rule goes into the next handoff, and the next session starts from there.

The working loop, and the file each step writes Six steps in a row - brief, spec, build, review, rule, next session - joined left to right by arrows, with a dashed arrow returning from the last step to the first. Below each step, the file it writes: brief-001-wow-and-contact.md, plan-001-showcase.md, the commits, copy-review-003.md, CLAUDE.md and handoff-NNN.md. the rule carries forward; the narrative does not Brief my words brief-001-wow-and-contact.md Spec what good means plan-001-showcase.md Build the agent commits Review OK · CUT · FIX copy-review-003.md Rule written down CLAUDE.md Next session handoff-NNN.md
Each step links to a real file from this site’s own build.
Handoffs

A written handoff, not a memory

An AI session starts without the last one’s context. So every session that changes anything ends by writing a numbered handoff: where things stand, what is still open, and what nearly went wrong. The next session reads it before it touches anything. The numbers run in one straight line; when the work forks, the open items get a tag instead of a second series of files. The rules for writing one are copied word for word into every handoff.handoff-017 §5

- **State, not narrative.** "The X is broken because Y" beats a story about discovering it. Nobody needs your journey.

- **Traps are worth more than successes.** If something cost you an hour, write it down in one sentence so it costs the next agent nothing. The stale-clone and `index.lock` notes in handoff-001 ยง2 are the model.

- **Never claim something is done that you have not verified.** "Deployed" means you saw it serve. "Written" means it is on disk. Say which.
Three of the fixed rules, verbatim from handoff-017.md §5. Curated: the section has more.
The rules

Rules I keep because an AI broke them

These are the rules I hold AI work to, across all of my projects. Each one was drawn from misses written down in handoffs, reviews and audits, and each row links one of them.

The rule, one miss behind it, and where it happened.
The ruleA miss behind itWhere
Measure the thing itself, not a stand-in for it: drag the slider, Tab through the page, load it logged out Three layout sliders shipped doing nothing. Each force measured correctly in a script; in the app, none of the sliders had any effect. I caught it by using them. R-050 the research graph
“Verified”, “clean” and “deployed” are claims. Check them from outside A security policy passed on a local server and blocked the analytics script on the live site. R-028 this site
The checker can be wrong too. Test the test A validator check reduced, algebraically, to a constant: it could never fail. R-045 the research graph
Say what you read, not what exists: “I could not see X”, never “X is missing” For about ten sessions a legal database was recorded as blocked to every tool. A real browser loaded it normally. R-080 the research graph
A quote is verbatim, or it is empty A research agent reported a footnote with an exact title and date. The footnote does not exist; it was assembled from true parts. R-075 the research graph
A recommendation, a premise or a summary is a hypothesis until it is checked Three of one session’s four recommendations rested on something false. R-072 the research graph
Never invent a date, a figure or an organisation. Unknown means ask me A site analysis invented a registered charity for my rare-disease site, with made-up social-media links to go with it. R-140 bareyourrare.org
No selling: no claims that go stale, no vanity numbers, no commitments that are not the AI’s to make The contact page promised I would reply “within a working day”, a commitment only I can make. I set it to “within a day or two”. handoff-003 this site
One copy of each fact. A claim repeated in three notes is still one claim An agent said three times that pushes were safe because there was no automatic deploy. The wrong belief was in three notes, so every check agreed with it. R-007 gpresidentialsociety.com
Whoever extracts does not also decide. A doubt gets reported, never quietly overridden An outside research model noticed its own quote pointed the opposite way, wrote that down, and kept the claim anyway. R-071 the research graph
Where AI is weak

Where AI is weak, and what I do about it

  1. Plausible, wrong facts

    It fills a gap with something that sounds right: a charity that does not exist, a footnote built from true parts.

    What I do: an unknown is a question for me, and a quote is checked against its source or left empty · R-140
  2. Drift across sessions

    A wrong belief written into one note gets copied into the next, until it looks settled.

    What I do: one current handoff, one copy of each fact, and anything about deploys checked against the live site · R-007
  3. Numbers

    Exact counts go out of date, and counts from memory are simply wrong.

    What I do: count with a command, and round in copy · R-011
  4. Over-polish

    It writes like marketing: promises in my name, impressive numbers, claims that go stale.

    What I do: no copy ships until I have ruled on it, block by block · handoff-003
  5. “Done” that is not done

    A passing script, a clean checker report or a working local copy stands in for the real thing.

    What I do: use it: drag the slider, Tab through the page, load it live. And make sure the check can fail · R-050

In the research graph, the checks are code. Its rule is “No document, no edge”: a link between two reports goes in only if something published says it exists. Dozens of checks run on every report and every link, and a change to the data is not finished until they pass. A link that cites a homepage instead of the document is flagged. A link graded A must carry the exact words it was found from. A report cannot depend on itself, or on a report that is not in the graph. The checks are checked too: one once reduced to a constant that could never fail, and it was rewritten so that it can.R-045

The originals

The files this page is drawn from